I've never been that into apologetics. Apologetics being the reason-based arguments for the defense of or proof of the Christian faith. It seems to me that there is a lot of "bad science" involved. Well-intentioned believers become convinced that the world will come to Jesus if they simply have a chance to lay out the air-tight case for Christianity. They become so eager to do this that they start throwing around unproven (if not unlikely) theories for things like the flood. "I heard somewhere" sorts of information gets passed quickly and widely as fact. It's not as though there hasn't been any credible work, but every bit of "bad science" seems to take us back further than good science is capable of bringing us forward. And it's not as if evolutionists are never guilty of the same thing, but that is none of my concern.
The whole idea of having an air-tight argument does not jive with me. Attempts to defend the faith often turn into intellectual jabs that do more to harm the faith than Darwin ever could have (I think of decals which have the ICTHUS eating a Darwin fish). Well-formed defenses (non-argumentative) can aide in removing some doubt, bt ultimately, Christ must be taken on faith.
But I over-react. Apologetics are, in my opinion, so dominated by quips and slogans that I tend to avoid any association with it. That's not a good stand. That's not the one Saul/Paul took. Acts 9:20 "At once [Saul] began to preach in the synagogues that Jesus is the Son of God. 21 All those who heard him were astonished and asked, "Isn't he the man who raised havoc in Jerusalem among those who call on this name? And hasn't he come here to take them as prisoners to the chief priests?" 22 Yet Saul grew more and more powerful and baffled the Jews living in Damascus by proving that Jesus is the Christ.
What proofs can we offer?





Here is a great example: